Chevrolet Corvette Z06 3LZ.Chevrolet Corvette Z06 3LZ 650HP 650TQ 13,582 KMs 2015 80,995.Two highly hyped sports cars thunder to a close finish in this Motor Trend comparison between a 2015 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 and a 2015 Nissan GTR Nismo.John Gardner is the mayor of Aynor, South Carolina population 763, a purchaser of beer, and a mower of lawns.Late last month, Gardner was pulled over by police.Chevrolet Corvette Z0.Nissan GT R Nismo Comparison.Free Price Quote From a Local Dealer.Z8bnoIwo.jpg' alt='Corvette Z06 Auto Vs Manual Offroad' title='Corvette Z06 Auto Vs Manual Offroad' />Corvettes are dirty cars.I dont care how many times they go to LeMans with the Z06, a Corvette will always remind me of Dirk Diggler, the 1970s, shag carpeting.View Special Offers.No Obligation, Fast Simple Free New Car Quote.Among the automakers, the automotive media, and the fans, new vehicles face great expectations from the moment their existence is revealed.Speculation and bench racing run rampant as we all try to infer from the available data how a vehicle should perform and how it will compare to the best in the segment.This prejudgment is no better illustrated than in the realm of sports cars, which brings us to these two perfect examples.Both the Chevrolet Corvette Z0.Nissan GT R NISMO were among the most anticipated sports cars of recent years.The former sees a thoroughly improved chassis and interior matched to an even more capable drivetrain and suspension that promise to steal the mantle of supercar killer from the latter, a no holds barred rethink of the dominant supercar killer of the past decade.Both cars promise performance normally reserved for cars two and three times the price, and both deliver in markedly different ways.From Chevrolet, we find a traditional formula writ for the 2.A supercharged 6.V 8 in the front drives a seven speed manual transaxle that attempts to put 6.Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 nearly slick tires, and Chevrolets Z0.Stage III aerodynamics package.A more comparable eight speed automatic model was not available for this test.Nissans approach is by no means new but is less traditional than Chevrolets.A twin turbocharged 3.V 6 sends power to a six speed dual clutch automatic in the tail that then routes power primarily to the rear wheels but constantly monitors and redistributes torque to the front wheels as needed for maximum performance.The hand of Nissans NISMO performance department can be seen in the cars increased output of 6.As it has from the R3.GT Rs beginning in 2.Japan, Nissan has made continual improvements to the GT R NISMOs complex software, even midyear.In this case, it means tweaks to the engine control software to eliminate a slight plateau in midrange power output, something we noticed on an early 2.August. The result is plainly evident at the test track and from behind the wheel.From a standing start, the 3,8.NISMO hits 6. 0 mph in the same 2.What plateau Good stuff, you say, but clearly the Z0.NISMO. You would be wrong.The super Vette needs 3.Z0. 6 fans will no doubt notice thats a tenth of a second slower on both counts and 1. Repository Creation Utility Installation Steps For Door . Z0. 6 we tested MT February 2.The reason for the discrepancy, we believe, is aerodynamics.The first Z0. 6 was outfitted with the Stage II aerodynamic kit, but this car features the Stage III kit, which adds a significantly taller rear wing and front splitter extensions.Although good for high speed handling, the additional downforce also means additional drag.As for comparing it to the NISMO, the Vette is hampered not only by its drag but also by its slower manual transmission and the need to put all the power to just two wheels.The Vette has other tricks, though.Its massive carbon ceramic brakes wider, stickier front tires and lower curb weight all contributed to a significantly shorter stopping distance.From 6. 0 mph, the Z0.The steel braked NISMO needed 9.However, these cars were not designed for drag racing, even if they happen to be quite good at it.These are street legal track cars.Theyre made for corners, and theyre very good with those, too.The NISMOs 1. 0. Although its figure eight lap time was two tenths of a second slower than the other NISMO, its 0.GT R up from 0. Both deliver performance typically reserved for cars two and three times the price.Sticky as the GT R is, its no match for the Z0.As it stands, the Z0.Porsche 9. 18 Spyder.With a 2. 2. 3 second lap at 1.Z0. 6 and substantially grippier up from 0.Tracking the data, we see the Corvette achieve higher speeds in the straights and brake later and harder than the NISMO, and it carries more speed around the corners.All this despite a frustrating but mild mid corner oversteer that, if not managed, easily becomes a spin.On a simple skidpad, the Z0.Unfortunately for the Z0.We brought the cars to historic Willow Springs to let their monstrous power and grip loose on the Big Track, colloquially known as the Fastest Road in the West.At 2. For this, we brought in our favorite pro driver, Randy Pobst, who turned an impressive 1 2.NISMO but only a 1 2.Z0. 6. How did that happen We were as surprised as you.The Z0. 6 has obvious weight, power, and grip advantages, and yet it lost by more than a second.In fact, it barely beat the even less powerful and lighter Porsche 9.GT3s lap time despite a whopping 1.Heres what the data showed The Z0.NISMO and carried more speed through the middle of most corners, but the NISMO was back on the throttle sooner and carried more speed out.Whats more, the NISMO was significantly faster on the straights, besting the Z0.Best we can figure, the answer is in the aerodynamics.The Z0. 6s big front splitter and vertical rear wing create downforce that helped the car carry more speed mid corner, but the drag they create held it back on the straights.This wasnt an issue on the figure eight, as the speeds were significantly lower.To verify, we removed the clear Gurney flap center piece on the rear wing and had Randy give it another go.As we predicted, the Z0.Add to that the Z0.It felt faster than the lap time, but it also didnt feel like it had 6.Randy said. Just not as fast as I expected.He also griped it had too much mid corner oversteer, and the throttle is too sharp, so I cant modulate it like I want to.Then he said something weve never heard him say before Id put some understeer into it.It doesnt understeer the front has tremendous grip.Id put a little understeer into it to settle down the rear.He followed that with On the laps where I used PTM Chevrolets Performance Traction Management, I found myself leaning on the stability control.I hate doing that, but it controlled the oversteer.He also preferred running the car in Sport handling mode rather than Track, as he found Tracks suspension settings much too stiff.Its beating me up out there, and this track isnt that rough.He did have nice things to say, too.The brakes are phenomenal.The pedal feel, the stopping power, theyre way better than the GT Rs.And The Z0. Its a challenge.The GT R is too boring.And I love the manual shifter.Its old school. Im old school.He was less animated about the GT R.It just grips everywhere.They took some of the understeer out from the last one we tested.Its better balanced.Id love to see some cup tires and some bigger brakes on it.It could handle them.The power delivery is better, too.The NISMO is all business, never evoking as much emotional response.With the shock of the track results still front of mind, Carlos Lago and I set off for one of Californias best driving roads to determine whether the track results would be reflected in the real world.There it became a much closer competition.We hemmed and hawed, discussing how each cars strengths and weaknesses balanced out the others.Lago figured hed be quicker in the NISMO, owing to its incredible ability to pull out of corners at warp speed.To me, the Z0. 6s better brakes made me more confident and allowed me to carry more speed into the corners, where the massive grip would carry me through quicker.The mid corner oversteer that was so obvious at the track was nowhere to be found on the road.We agreed the NISMOs higher seating position gave better outward visibility but made the car feel more top heavy and imparted the sensation it was rolling over much more than the lower, racier Z0.It was also hard to ignore the NISMOs extra weight, both under braking and in corners.In the end, we agreed the Z0.When it came time to make the long drive home, it was an easier decision for me.The Z0. 6s third generation magnetorheological shock absorbers remain the best in the business and make the car a far more comfortable ride on the street than the stiff NISMO, even with that cars Comfort suspension setting.The NISMOs insistence on chasing every single groove in the pavement also gets old quickly.Sure, the Z0. 6s manual transmission was more work in traffic, but a reasonably light clutch made it mostly a non issue.Police Force Mayor On Lawnmower To Pour Out His Beer.John Gardner is the mayor of Aynor, South Carolina population 7.Late last month, Gardner was pulled over by police while riding a lawnmower through Aynor, in addition to possessing some beer, a situation that was caught on dashcam video.There is some dispute as to whether the beer was open or not, but Gardner told The Sun News last week that it was not, which doesnt really make any sense, but sure.Gardner was not arrested or charged with a crime.From The Sun News It was unopened to the best of my knowledge, Gardner said in an interview Friday.I remember opening it to pour it out.Gardner says he was not cited, and the video shows officers saying they would call the Town of Aynor to handle the situation.Gardner, who was elected in 2.He said he thinks he was pulled over because the lawnmower had no lights.Be careful out there after dark, if youre riding a mower and in possession of some beer.Remember safety first.Click here to view this www.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |